5 Years on; JR Fukuchiyama Line Accident (JR福知山線脱線事故)
Sunday, April 25th, 2010Continuing the tradition of my blog, every day of this year is dedicated to the 107 lives lost and over 1500+ (counting each passenger on board has at least two next-of-kin) changed on this day, April 25th 2005, when a JR Fukuchiyama Line Rapid Service train derailed and crashed into an apartment building’s ground floor area.
Picture from The Golden-toks
The present color for the JR West Series 207 is as above. Series 321 is also colored in the same style.
Every year this accident brings back the same questions; is railway travel safer than before? Are humans still dependent on safety devices to prevent an accident from happening? Are yesterday’s safety devices still valid today?
As the 5-year deadline for civil lawsuits pending to this accident drawing to a close, three ex-JR West Chairmen were charged with operational negligence resulting in fatalities. The charge mentioned “This accident can be foreseen, negligence in informing the Railway Department to install ATS (Automatic Train Stop)”.
Article from Yomiuri News:
JR西歴代3社長を強制起訴…福知山線事故
2005年4月、兵庫県尼崎市で起きたJR福知山線脱線事故で検事役の指定弁護士は23日、JR西日本の歴代社長3人を業務上過失致死傷罪で神戸地裁に在宅起訴した。
起訴状では「事故の危険性を予見できたのに、自動列車停止装置(ATS)の整備を鉄道本部長に指示すべき注意義務を怠った過失がある」と指摘した。同社関係者によると、3人は公判で無罪を主張する意向だ。
改正検察審査会法に基づく「起訴議決」を経て指定弁護士が強制起訴するのは、兵庫県明石市の歩道橋事故に次ぎ全国2件目。
起訴されたのは井手正敬(まさたか)(75)、南谷(なんや)昌二郎(68)、垣内剛(66)の元社長3人。神戸地検が同罪で在宅起訴した山崎正夫・前社長(66)を含め、社長経験者4人が刑事責任を問われる。
起訴状によると、JR西は輸送力増強と収益拡大の経営方針から、1996年12月、現場カーブを半径600メートルから急な304メートルに付け替え、ダイヤ改正で快速電車も1日34本から94本に増発させ、脱線の危険性が高まっていた。
当時、井手氏は社長、南谷氏は副社長、垣内氏は経営企画部長として、現場の状況や、付け替え直前にJR函館線の半径300メートルのカーブで貨物列車の脱線事故が起きたことを認識し、危険性を予見できた。さらに、3人はそれぞれの社長在任中、鉄道本部長にATS整備を指示すべき注意義務を怠ったとされる。
神戸第1検察審査会の起訴議決を受け、指定弁護士は3月29日に選任されたばかりだったが、公訴時効(5年)が迫り、1か月足らずでの起訴となった。
指定弁護士は、地裁に公判前整理手続きの適用を要請した。手続きに入れば、争点が多岐にわたり、初公判は来年以降の可能性が高い。
(2010年4月24日01時41分 読売新聞)
Important excerpts:
…JR West, in view of increasing capacity and revenue, reduced the accident curve from R=600 to R=304 in 1996, increased Rapid Service trains from 34 to 94 trains per day, thereby increasing the possibility of derailment.
…The three accused, at that point of time, were in the position of chairman, vice-chairman and COO, given the situation at the site, plus an accident which involved a JR Freight train in Hakodate at a R=300 curve, they were aware of the danger (posed by the R=304 curve). Yet, they did not inform/order the railway department chief to install ATS at the site.
~
- R stands for radius, a curve’s maximum degree of turn. A curve comprises of a gradual turn, the radii turn (where the value is taken), and then a gradual turn back to a straight line.
JR West, in the publics’ eye, did not have any image change over this 5 years despite campaigns to win the commuter’s heart over again. Numerous reports of preventable incidents, staff reforms and recently the EB (Emergency Brake) switch function disabled on some trains caused concerns in Japan again, about the practices and culture that JR West harbors.

